首頁 » 《停損的勝算》讀後心得:堅持不一定會成功,或許你需要的是放棄

《停損的勝算》讀後心得:堅持不一定會成功,或許你需要的是放棄

by seanreads
61 comments

「行百里半九十」、「成功是屬於永不放棄的人」關於成功的故事或是名言,我們都聽過很多,而且多半是跟堅持劃上等號。如果有人說放棄才能成功,你可能會笑笑的,然後想說這個人是不是瘋了?

「堅持到底」真的好嗎?

以爬聖母峰來說,放棄,怎可能會登上聖母峰呢?不管再怎麼想,都是要「堅持」才有辦法登頂吧?但反過來想,如果堅持登頂會讓你喪命,這樣的堅持是好的嗎?

《停損的勝算:世界撲克冠軍教你精準判斷何時放棄,反而贏更多》開頭就以登聖母峰為例,在基地營的時候,領隊會將攻頂日的折返時間訂在下午一點,在這個時間,如果還沒能登頂,就一定得折返,即使是已經走到了峰頂的影子下。因為比起上山,下山可能會遇到更惡劣多變的天候,以及自己更差的生理狀況,所以爬聖母峰下山途中,喪命的人數是上山的八倍。

在這個狀況下,能不能果斷放棄,甚至攸關生死。

如果你對自己的決斷非常有自信,那麼《停損的勝算》有兩個非常怵目驚心的例子:

第一、曾經跟大家一再強調必須在下午一點前折返的優秀登山領隊羅伯.霍爾,為了等客戶登頂,等到下午四點,最後跟客戶一起命喪聖母峰。

第二、研究「放棄與加碼付出」主題,最了解陷入不可自拔地步會導致嚴重後果的學者傑佛瑞.R,立志要爬完英格蘭的百大高峰,在爬第一百座的福特山時,因天候惡劣,傑佛瑞.R的登山夥伴決定掉頭。但他不肯走,獨自往目標前進,幾天後他的遺體在山上被發現。

放棄,為什麼那麽難?

連登山專家跟專研放棄的心理學家都因堅持栽了跟斗。放棄,為什麼那麽難?

書中提到幾個原因:

1、損失規避的心態,當我們遇到虧損時,除了更可能堅持必敗的行動方針,還很容易加碼付出。

2、沉沒成本謬誤,讓我們聚焦已付出的心力與時間,而捨不得放棄。

3、稟賦效應,讓我們不合理地提升擁有物的價值,導致不願意放棄。

4、不作為偏誤,認為改變現狀才是做決定,因而決定維持現狀(事實上維持現狀也是一個決定)。

5、對於舊身份的執著,致使有新的機會出現,也不願放棄舊身分。

那知道原因了之後,我們就能避免這些狀況嗎?真的也不一定,前面提到的兩個案例,就證明了知與行之間是有差異的。

要如何更有效停損或是放棄,有人認為可以在每次做決定時,假裝自己第一次做決定,書中舉了對於前景不佳的公司,是否會加碼投資的心理實驗說明,「假裝自己第一次做決定」並沒有辦法讓自己脫離「虧損再加碼」的狀態。

先訓練猴子比先建基座重要

所幸《停損的勝算》分享幾個很有幫助的方法:

1、猴子與基座:想像你要訓練猴子站在公園的基座上,用幾支火把表演雜耍,讓它變成一個賺錢的節目。這個節目最困難的點,莫過於「訓練猴子用火把表演雜耍」,但很多時候,我們會因為最關鍵的項目非常棘手,導致我們選擇先「建基座」,麻痺自己當前已有進展,又或是因為已經「建基座」,有了沈沒成本,導致不願意放棄。所以可以運用 「猴子與基座」的心理模型,想想當前最關鍵、困難的「訓練猴子」是哪個部分,幫助我們適時放棄。

2、透過「事前驗屍」方式,預想事件中可能會發生的問題,並為未來的行動「設立終止條件」,最簡單的方式,是為某個狀態加上日期,比如藉由事先驗屍,得出「通常如果對方的主管都不出席會議,那麼通常合作案就很難談成」等徵兆,因此設定「如果第三次的研討會議,對方的主管仍未出席,那麼就直接放棄合作,轉而開發新專案」,避免繼續虛耗。

3、尋找放棄教練,讓旁觀者協助看清事實,重點是,要允許他們說真話。另外,也可以讓決定開始與放棄的人選不同,改善放棄的決策品質。

4、心態方面,要讓自己習慣向前看而非向後看,向後看會讓自己看到許多已投注的心力,向前看才能比較清楚看見未來。作者也以撲克牌界流傳的話「打牌是常常久久的事」,幫助自己適時收手,就如「登聖母峰」其實並非最終目標,「登聖母峰,且平安下山返家」才是,爬山也是長長久久的事,山一直都會在,不需要執著要在當次登頂。

5、標記一路上的進展。跨越終點線才算成功,是僵化的,不僅會讓我們得失心過重,也會容易忽略周遭變化與轉機,當我們標記一路上的進展,給予自己肯定後,或許雖然沒能達成當初設定的目標,卻會有其他收穫。

不過放棄,不是指躺平,什麼都不做,而是停止陷入當前泥沼困境,轉而發現其他契機。書的最後以螞蟻搬運食物為例,即使面前有一大塊西瓜,在螞蟻集體合作搬運的過程中,仍會有少數螞蟻脫隊探勘其他區域,也因此讓團隊有備用方案的可能,這樣萬一這塊西瓜被掃掉了,還會有其他糧食。同樣的,探勘也可以協助我們多元發展技能、興趣、機會,抵禦未知的可能。

後見

看完《停損的勝算》,想到NBA公鹿隊爭冠失利,記者問當家球星字母哥會不會認為這是失敗的一年,字母哥回應,這一年他們也付出了努力,也有收穫,不能因為沒有奪冠,就否定這一切。

讓成功與失敗只有一線之隔,讓我們忍不住關注已經付出的心力,而不願放棄。又畢竟我們看的很多在車庫創業成功的例子,卻很少看到在車庫創業失敗的例子,所以會認為堅持是美德,殊不知,放棄也是一種美德。

這本書涵括很多商業、政策、運動場的實例,以及之前沒看過心理實驗,來談論放棄與停損,各章節環環相扣也都有重點,非常推薦一讀!

You may also like

61 comments

Scotthiece 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:04

A piece that left me thinking I had been undercaring about the topic, and a look at emberfieldmarket reinforced that mild concern, content that raises the appropriate weight of a subject without being preachy about it is doing important work and this site is providing that gentle elevation of attention for me consistently.

Reply
Kentonser 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:06

Will be passing this along to a few people who would benefit from the perspective shared here, and a stop at focuspowersmovement only added to what I will be sharing, this kind of generous content deserves to circulate widely rather than getting buried in some search engine algorithm tweak that pushes it down the rankings.

Reply
Jeanjab 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:09

Picked this for a morning recommendation in our company chat, and a look at orbitbonding suggested I will mention this site again later, recommending content into a workplace context is a small editorial act that requires confidence in the recommendation and this site is making me confident in those recommendations consistently here too.

Reply
Bradenfoorb 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:12

Generally I do not leave comments but this post merits a small note, and a stop at momentumcore extended that comment worthy quality, the urge to actively contribute to a sites community rather than passively consume from it is something specific content provokes and this site has provoked that engagement urge from me today.

Reply
Coreylag 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:14

Once you start reading carefully here it is hard to go back to lower quality alternatives, and a stop at blog44hits reinforced that ratchet effect, the way good content raises standards is real over time and this site has clearly contributed to raising my expectations for what is possible in writing on the topic generally.

Reply
PrinceZow 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:15

Better than most of the writing I have come across on this topic recently, simpler and more direct, and a look at blog33memorys continued in that same way, a real outlier in a crowded space full of repetitive content that says little while taking up a lot of reader time today which is unfortunate.

Reply
Allenrop 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:17

Worth pointing out that the writer made the topic feel more interesting than I had been expecting, and a look at brightbuild continued that elevation effect, content that improves the apparent quality of its subject through skilled treatment is doing something real and this site has clearly developed that kind of editorial alchemy throughout.

Reply
Carteremuth 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:20

A thoughtful piece that did not strain to be thoughtful, and a look at fluentform continued that effortless quality, when thinking shows up in writing without the writer drawing attention to it you know you are reading something genuinely considered rather than something performing the appearance of consideration which is also common online.

Reply
ReeseFuh 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:24

A piece that handled multiple complications without becoming confused, and a look at pointpath continued that organisational clarity, holding multiple threads in a single piece without losing any of them is a sign of skilled writing and this site has clearly developed the editorial discipline to manage complexity without sacrificing readability throughout.

Reply
Roderickpoota 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:29

Walked away with a clearer head than I had before reading this, and a quick visit to iconflow only sharpened that, the writing has a way of cutting through the noise that surrounds most topics online which is something I will definitely remember the next time I am searching for an answer to anything.

Reply
Calebken 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:30

Appreciate the practical examples, they made the abstract points easier to grasp, and a stop at blog33never added more of the same, this site clearly understands that real examples beat empty theory every single time which is the mark of a writer who knows their audience well and respects their time.

Reply
Kalebguefs 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:34

Worth recognising the absence of the usual blog tropes here, and a look at 5-g continued that fresh quality, sites that avoid the standard moves of the medium read as more original even when the content is on familiar topics and this one has clearly chosen its own path through the conventional terrain skilfully.

Reply
JimTar 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:34

Reading this triggered a small reorganisation of my own thinking on the topic, and a stop at blog33read furthered that reorganisation, content that affects the shape of my mental model rather than just decorating it with new facts is content with structural rather than informational impact and this site provides that.

Reply
EdmundDache 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:37

Probably the kind of site that should be more widely read than it appears to be, and a look at optiorder reinforced that quiet wish, the gap between a sites quality and its apparent reach is sometimes large and that gap exists for this site in a way that makes me want to mention it more.

Reply
Warrenrow 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:42

A thoughtful read in a week that has been mostly noisy, and a look at risereach carried that thoughtful quality across more pages, finding pockets of considered writing in a week of distractions is one of the small wins of careful curation and this site is providing those pockets at a sustainable rate.

Reply
Hoseaguefe 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:51

My usual pattern is to skim and bounce but this site has reset that pattern temporarily, and a stop at megaluxurious maintained the slower reading mode, content that changes how I read is content with structural influence and this site has clearly nudged my reading behaviour toward something better at least for the duration of these visits.

Reply
RyanZooda 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 7:58

Skipped a meeting reminder to finish the post, and a stop at joltcloud held me past another reminder, when content beats meetings the writer is doing something extraordinary because meetings have institutional support behind them and yet good writing can still occasionally win that competition for attention which I find heartening today.

Reply
ElliotIdola 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 8:05

Now appreciating that the post did not require me to agree with the writer to find it valuable, and a look at blog33behavior maintained the same useful regardless of agreement quality, content that informs even when it does not convince is content with broader utility and this site reads as useful even when I disagree.

Reply
Nelsonsnunc 2026 年 8 月 13 日 - 上午 8:36

Felt the post was written for someone like me without explicitly addressing me, and a look at appultimate produced the same fit, when content lands on its target without pandering you know the writer has done careful audience thinking rather than relying on demographic targeting or interest signals to do the work of editorial decisions.

Reply
Amarimog 2026 年 8 月 15 日 - 上午 7:59

Worth observing that the post landed without needing a flashy headline to hook attention, and a stop at questqrypty did the same, content that earns engagement through substance rather than packaging is the kind I trust more deeply and this site has clearly chosen substance as the primary lever for reader engagement throughout.

Reply
DamianBus 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 5:57

A piece that did not lean on the writer credentials or institutional backing, and a look at freshfinder maintained the same focus on substance, content that earns trust through quality rather than through name dropping is the kind I find most persuasive and this site is clearly playing on the substance side of that distinction.

Reply
LeroyFit 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 8:19

Taking the time to read carefully here has been worthwhile for the past hour, and a look at novalyn extended the worthwhile reading, the calculation of return on reading time spent is something I do informally and this site has been producing positive returns across multiple sessions during the last week of regular visits and reads.

Reply
ErnestStast 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 9:02

Reading this in pieces during a long afternoon and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at gervina fit naturally into the same fragmented reading pattern, sites whose posts can be read in segments without losing the thread are well suited to how I actually read these days and this one is built well.

Reply
DaxVut 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 9:29

Worth every minute of the time spent reading, and a stop at urbanurn extends that value across more pages, in a media environment where most content is engineered to waste attention this site stands out by treating reader time as something valuable rather than something to be exploited and stretched as far as possible.

Reply
Jesusfek 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 10:35

A welcome contrast to the loud takes that have dominated my feed lately, and a look at sublimationstation extended that calm voice, content that arrives without yelling has become unusual in the modern attention economy and this site is one of the few places I have found that consistently delivers without raising its voice.

Reply
LouisPoito 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 10:42

Honest reaction is that this is the kind of writing I would defend in a conversation about good blog content, and a look at lahorelabel reinforced that, the rare site whose work I would actively recommend rather than just tolerate is the kind I want to support through return visits regularly.

Reply
CarmeloDon 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 10:43

Reading this between two meetings turned out to be the highlight of the morning, and a stop at bazaarbright continued that highlight quality, content that outshines the structured parts of a working day is doing something well beyond ordinary and this site has produced multiple such highlights for me already this week alone.

Reply
LiamGuels 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 10:57

During a quiet evening reading session this provided just the right depth without being heavy, and a stop at keywordkiosk maintained the same evening appropriate weight, content with depth that does not exhaust the reader is content with editorial calibration and this site has clearly figured out how to be substantial without being demanding all the time.

Reply
Williamhaigh 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 11:17

Excellent post, balanced and well organised without showing off, and a stop at devsmith continued in that same vein, this site has clearly figured out the formula for content that works for readers rather than for search engine ranking signals which is harder than it sounds today and worth real recognition from anyone.

Reply
DamianFrers 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 11:22

A piece that did exactly what it promised in the headline without overshooting or underdelivering, and a look at appfortune continued that calibration, alignment between promise and delivery is a basic editorial virtue that many sites fail at and this site has clearly mastered the matching of expectation and substance throughout pieces.

Reply
GabrielHet 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 11:27

If I am being honest this is the kind of site I quietly hope my own work will someday resemble, and a stop at blog44may extended that aspirational feeling, finding work that models what I want to produce is part of why I read carefully and this site has been performing that modelling function for me lately consistently.

Reply
RodneyPef 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 11:31

A genuine compliment to the writer for keeping the post focused on what mattered, and a look at fluiddash continued that disciplined focus, focus is a editorial choice that compounds across many small decisions and this site has clearly made those small decisions consistently across what I have read so far this week here.

Reply
PhillipCic 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 上午 11:43

A piece that reads like it was written for me without claiming to be written for me, and a look at blog33single produced the same fit, when the writer audience match clicks naturally without being engineered through demographic targeting you know the writing is solid and this site has that natural fit consistently for me.

Reply
Nickneoro 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 下午 12:19

My time on this site has now extended past what I had budgeted, and a stop at appcreek keeps extending it further, content that overstays its budget in my schedule is content that has earned the extra time and this site has been earning extra time across multiple visits to the point where my schedule needs adjustment.

Reply
Jaylendew 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 下午 12:24

Appreciate the work that went into laying this out so clearly, every section earns its place without filler, and a look at thrivenet confirmed the same care, definitely the kind of place that deserves a return visit when the topic comes up again later in the future or for any related question.

Reply
ClaytonGaL 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 下午 12:26

A thoughtful piece that did not strain to be thoughtful, and a look at tracerunway continued that effortless quality, when thinking shows up in writing without the writer drawing attention to it you know you are reading something genuinely considered rather than something performing the appearance of consideration which is also common online.

Reply
LedgerUlcen 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 下午 9:16

Genuinely changed how I think about a small piece of the topic, which does not happen often online, and a look at xacttrove added another nudge in the same direction, the kind of writing that earns a small mental shift rather than just confirming what you already thought before reading is a sign of careful thought.

Reply
SamuelThouH 2026 年 8 月 21 日 - 下午 9:42

Appreciate the work that went into laying this out so clearly, every section earns its place without filler, and a look at softport confirmed the same care, definitely the kind of place that deserves a return visit when the topic comes up again later in the future or for any related question.

Reply
EzekielCroks 2026 年 8 月 24 日 - 下午 5:53

Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at zappyzeny maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.

Reply
IanJoymn 2026 年 8 月 24 日 - 下午 5:53

Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at hormonehelp reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.

Reply
FloydStutt 2026 年 8 月 25 日 - 下午 9:14

Thanks for a post that does not try to be funny when it is not the moment for it, and a stop at readypixel maintained the same appropriate seriousness, knowing when humour helps and when it just signals desperation for engagement is a sign of editorial maturity that many blogs have not developed yet.

Reply
NormanRhync 2026 年 8 月 25 日 - 下午 9:15

Looking at this objectively the editorial quality is hard to deny even setting aside personal taste, and a stop at blog66approach maintained the same objective quality, the gap between what I personally enjoy and what is objectively well crafted exists and this site clears both bars simultaneously which is rarer than it sounds.

Reply
ElmervorSe 2026 年 8 月 26 日 - 下午 7:47

Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at blog66approach extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.

Reply
EddieImpox 2026 年 8 月 26 日 - 下午 7:48

Now planning to share the link with a small group of readers I trust, and a look at vistawave suggested more material to share with the same group, recommending content into a curated circle requires confidence in the recommendation and this site is making me confident in those personal recommendations on multiple separate occasions now.

Reply
IssacBub 2026 年 9 月 1 日 - 上午 1:13

Bookmark moved to my permanent reference folder rather than the casual maybe later folder, and a look at makermerchant earned the same upgrade, the distinction between casual interest and lasting reference is something I track carefully and very few sites cross that threshold but this one did so without much effort apparently.

Reply
IraStymn 2026 年 9 月 2 日 - 下午 10:34

Bookmark earned and folder updated to track this site separately, and a look at clarvesta confirmed the folder upgrade was the right call, organising my reading list so that good sites do not get lost in a sea of casual bookmarks is something I do more carefully now and this site warranted its own spot.

Reply
StefanAwago 2026 年 9 月 4 日 - 上午 1:05

Looking through the archives suggests this site has been doing this for a while at this level, and a look at powermarineparts confirmed the long term consistency, sites that have maintained quality across years rather than just a recent stretch are sites with serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly been at it for a while.

Reply
Deanapado 2026 年 9 月 4 日 - 上午 6:09

Picked a friend mentally as the audience for this and decided to send the link, and a look at penpavilion confirmed the send was the right choice, choosing whom to share content with is a small act of curation that I take more seriously than the public sharing most platforms encourage these days online.

Reply
Juangrief 2026 年 9 月 4 日 - 下午 7:33

If the topic interests you at all this is a place to spend time, and a look at upcarton reinforced that recommendation, the broader question of where to invest topical reading time is one this site answers convincingly through the consistent quality across multiple pieces I have sampled during the current reading session today.

Reply
CoryZoola 2026 年 9 月 4 日 - 下午 7:56

Easy to recommend without reservations, the site delivers on every promise it implicitly makes, and a look at xobasket kept that same standard going, the kind of consistency that earns trust over time rather than chasing it through aggressive marketing is what I see here and it is appreciated greatly by this particular reader today.

Reply
SterlingBag 2026 年 9 月 4 日 - 下午 8:00

Liked how the post handled an objection I was forming as I read, and a stop at flarion similarly anticipated where my thinking was going next, the rare writer who can predict reader concerns and address them in advance is doing something most online content fails to do despite that being basic editorial work.

Reply
ErickErymn 2026 年 9 月 5 日 - 下午 8:26

Now realising the topic deserved better treatment than it has been getting elsewhere, and a look at makermerchant extended that broader recognition, content that exposes the gap between actual quality and average quality elsewhere is doing the quiet work of raising standards and this site is contributing to that elevation in its own corner.

Reply
KelvinVak 2026 年 9 月 5 日 - 下午 9:09

Came here from a search and stayed for the side links because they were that interesting, and a stop at kelnix took me even further into the site, the kind of organic exploration that good content invites is something most sites kill through aggressive interlinking and pushy navigation choices rather than relying on quality.

Reply
Borisutery 2026 年 9 月 6 日 - 上午 12:23

Liked the post enough to read it twice and the second read found new things, and a stop at garnetdock similarly rewarded the second look, content with hidden depths that only reveal themselves on careful rereading is the rare kind that earns lasting respect rather than fleeting first impressions only briefly held.

Reply
MarioVef 2026 年 9 月 6 日 - 上午 12:24

Skipped breakfast still reading this and finished hungry but satisfied, and a stop at quickaisle kept me past breakfast time, content that displaces basic biological needs is content with serious attentional pull and the writers here are clearly capable of producing that level of engagement which is genuinely impressive these days.

Reply
Emanuelrig 2026 年 9 月 7 日 - 上午 4:52

Appreciate that you did not pad this with fluff to hit a word count, the post says what it needs to say and stops, and a look at pinecrate did the same, brevity here feels intentional not lazy which is a distinction many writers miss completely sometimes when they are working under deadlines.

Reply
TimmyCor 2026 年 9 月 7 日 - 上午 5:16

Picked this site to mention to a colleague who would benefit, and a look at moonvendorcorner added more material I will pass along, recommending sites to colleagues is a higher bar than recommending to friends because the professional context demands more careful curation and this site cleared the professional bar without me having to think.

Reply
MorrisSof 2026 年 9 月 7 日 - 上午 8:33

Refreshing to find writing that does not try to manipulate the reader into clicking onto the next page through cliffhangers and forced engagement, and a stop at tealmarket continued in the same respectful way, this is what reader first design actually looks like in practice rather than just in marketing copy that sounds nice.

Reply
LayneSwise 2026 年 9 月 7 日 - 上午 8:47

Started forming counter examples to test the claims and the post handled most of them implicitly, and a look at boxmingle continued that anticipatory style, writers who think two steps ahead of the critical reader save themselves from a lot of follow up work and this writer has clearly internalised that habit consistently.

Reply
StephenSuisp 2026 年 9 月 7 日 - 下午 8:03

Reading this with a notebook open turned out to be the right move, and a stop at woodmarket added more material to the notes, content that justifies active note taking from a passive reader is content with real informational density and this site is producing notes worthy material at a high rate consistently.

Reply
Marlonjem 2026 年 9 月 8 日 - 上午 12:28

Decided to subscribe to the RSS feed if there is one, and a stop at tillora confirmed that decision, content that I want delivered to me proactively rather than just remembered when I have time is content that has earned a higher level of commitment from me as a reader looking for reliable sources.

Reply

Leave a Comment